30 July, 2011

UGANDA: War crimes trial may affect LRA defections - analysts

UGANDA: War crimes trial may affect LRA defections - analysts

GULU, 29 July 2011 (IRIN) - The trial of Thomas Kwoyelo, a former rebel in
Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army (LRA), the first such case before the
Ugandan High Court's International Crime Division (ICD), is eliciting mixed
reactions. Analysts say that while it may satisfy northerners' desire for
justice, there are concerns over its impact on future LRA defections.

Kwoyelo was charged with war crimes, including murder and kidnapping in
various northern Uganda locations, on 11 July in Gulu. He denied the
charges.

"The Kwoyelo trial sends mixed messages to current LRA fighters and
commanders," Ashley Benner, a policy analyst with the Enough Project, told
IRIN in an email.

"On the one hand, the Amnesty Act guarantees amnesty for the LRA, and
leafleting and radio programmes provide assurances that they can defect
without fear of prosecution. On the other hand, the Amnesty Commission has
been inconsistent in granting amnesties, and the Ugandan High Court has
begun prosecuting a mid-level LRA commander who has been refused amnesty."

Kwoyelo's amnesty application was referred to Uganda's Constitutional Court
for interpretation on 25 July.

The Amnesty Act [
http://www.c-r.org/our-work/accord/northern-uganda/documents/2000_Jan_The_Am
nesty_Act.doc
] provides that people who meet the amnesty requirements,
including renouncing and abandoning involvement in the war or armed
rebellion, cannot be prosecuted or punished for crimes covered by the act in
Uganda.

Benner added: "In order to make real progress toward diminishing the size
and strength of the LRA, Kampala should fully resume granting amnesties,
publicly clarify the application of the Amnesty Act and reinstate formal
channels for joining the Ugandan army."

Echoing this, Ned Dalby, analyst at International Crisis Group (ICG), said:
"Unfortunately, the trial does little to reassure LRA fighters still in the
bush in the DRC [Democratic Republic of Congo] and the CAR [Central African
Republic] that if they surrender they will be offered amnesty and be able to
return home.

"LRA combatants need to see escape and return as a viable option to fight
and flee."

According to a new Oxfam survey, LRA attacks continue in the DRC, resulting
in 26 deaths and 23 kidnappings in June alone.

The head of Oxfam in DRC, Pauline Ballaman, said: "Small mobile groups of
hungry LRA fighters continue to viciously target the most isolated and
forgotten people in northeastern DRC. Despite past military operations and
increased international attention, the LRA is still able to wreak havoc in
neglected communities and is responsible for widespread killings, abductions
and displacement."

Selective justice?

There have also been concerns about whether the ICD court, set up in 2007
after the incorporation of the International Criminal Court's Rome Statute,
lacks the required international procedures to provide Kwoyelo a fair trial
and sufficiently protect witnesses.

However, ICD presiding Judge Dan Akiiki-Kiiza said: "We are going to ensure
justice is delivered; the court is competent to handle cases of such
magnitude."

According to Stephen Oola, head of research and advocacy at the Refugee Law
Project, Kwoyelo's trial is important as it brings about a "semblance of
justice".

"The challenge is [what] about [the] other senior LRA commanders who have
been let off the hook? What we need is to achieve our goal of accountability
and reconciliation and this should mean justice should not be selective,"
said Oola.

The Ugandan government appeared to be using the Kwoyelo trial to show it is
taking on board the need for justice and accountability in the aftermath of
the northern Uganda conflict, said ICG's Dalby.

"It [the case] is high profile and very visible both at home and abroad.

"It may well satisfy some northerners' desire for justice at the national
level but is unlikely to speed up the slow process of reconciliation between
aggressors and victims within and between communities. This is the real
challenge facing the government and people of Uganda," he said.

Kwoyelo is accused of attacking an internally displaced persons camp in
Pagak where several civilians were killed between 1992 and 2005, laying
ambushes along the Gulu-Juba road, destroying civilian property and
abducting children in the Awer, Bira, Oputure and Pogo villages.

In August 2010, he was charged with wilful killings, hostage taking and
extensive destruction of property in Amuru and Gulu districts.

However, a former LRA major, John Ogil, said Kwoyelo's LRA duties mainly
involved manning the sick bay in Kilak with limited field operations.

Under orders

Former LRA high-ranking commanders, such as Brig Kenneth Banya and Otto,
have all received amnesty under the act over the last several years,
according to Human Rights Watch [
http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/07/07/uganda-qa-trial-thomas-kwoyelo ].

Kwoyelo's mother, Roselina Oyella, told IRIN her son was acting on the
orders of his superiors. "My son was abducted when he was barely 15 years
[old]; he committed the crimes on [the] orders of commanders like Vincent
Otti, [Kenneth] Banya and others."


At least 60 witnesses, most of them war-crime survivors in the north, are
expected to give evidence at the trial, which according to the defence
lawyer, Caleb Alaka, will help in healing the affected communities, albeit
with "an impact on amnesty".

No comments: